Gallbladder Flush Worked For Me
Question:
I’ll tell you what how’s about this I will do the flush and if you can get someone to analyse them (respecting my privacy) you can get them analysed? Anth
– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – (Best thing would be some kind of scan before and after) I’d like to see someone actually take these stones and mail them off to a lab to see what indeed they are. You mean alties haven’t already done this? It would seem to be a VERY obvious thing to do to see if these flushes are working, as would a before-and-after set of ultrasounds or CT scans. Why haven’t such things been done? A positive result for such things would at least be preliminary evidence that these flushes *might* work, but I’ve yet to see an altie show even evidence that rudimentary. — Orac |"A statement of fact cannot be insolent." | |"If you cannot listen to the answers, why do you | inconvenience me with questions?"
Response:
Sometimes your poo is larger than your anus. Anth
– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Curious…has nobody out there done any definitive serious testing in this area to determine whether there is any value in "stone flushing" or whether its devotees are several salami slices short of a sandwich? What about all that Government CAM money research? Doesn’t seem like this would be rocket science…or would it? Or maybe the product sellers//practioners would rather this info not be known? In many cases, there’s no real point. It’s obvious on the face of it, for example, that these "gall bladder flushes" can’t possibly work, because the supposed "gallstones" they produce are far too large to fit through the bile duct. My favorite analogy is that it’d be like trying to push a beach ball through a garden hose. — David Wright :: alphabeta at prodigy.net These are my opinions only, but they’re almost always correct. "If I have not seen as far as others, it is because giants were standing on my shoulders." (Hal Abelson, MIT)
Response:
You don’t even need people with stones, scan yourself, take the flush, if you have no stones and zillioins come out then you know there’s a rabbit up. Take the stones to your chem lab, get them analysed and show what they are. I think the fact that someone on here was flushing and later (when they needed surgery) were found to be ‘very stoned’ is a decent enough argument against the flush. Anth
– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – "Mark Probert-February 28, 2004" <Mark Very simple. Not very expensive. Yet I have not seen a single altie describe or quote such a study? Why has such a blindingly obvious and simple study not been done? It’s so freaking simple as far as medical studies go, yet it appears that alties haven’t done it. — Orac |"A statement of fact cannot be insolent." | |"If you cannot listen to the answers, why do you | inconvenience me with questions?"
Response:
Pretty simple really , there is no money to be made by them out of any natural cures . As for gallstones , questions you may have will most likely be answered somewhere here http://www.curezone.com/cleanse/liver/ if you take the time to check it out . Make up your own mind , like I said , it worked for me and others I know so I am not interested in arguing with the detractors , their opinions are of no relevance to me . My doctor certainly knows the difference between gallstones and some imaginary mixture of oil and grapefruit juice . Have you ever wondered why the detractors are so vocal about something that they claim doesn’t work ? , if it was so then why would they even bother to comment ? , to save us all from what ? Bew
Again, just curious. How would you do a Million Dollar, double blind, controlled test on what, olive oil & something else? Would you also use a "placebo"? Seems like all this would be a little overkill just to find out what the "stones" are actually composed of. But that’s just me.
— Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Response:
Curious…has nobody out there done any definitive serious testing in this area to determine whether there is any value in "stone flushing" or whether its devotees are several salami slices short of a sandwich? What about all that Government CAM money research? Doesn’t seem like this would be rocket science…or would it? Or maybe the product sellers//practioners would rather this info not be known?
In many cases, there’s no real point. It’s obvious on the face of it, for example, that these "gall bladder flushes" can’t possibly work, because the supposed "gallstones" they produce are far too large to fit through the bile duct. My favorite analogy is that it’d be like trying to push a beach ball through a garden hose. — David Wright :: alphabeta at prodigy.net These are my opinions only, but they’re almost always correct. "If I have not seen as far as others, it is because giants were standing on my shoulders." (Hal Abelson, MIT)
Response:
"Mark Probert-February 28, 2004" <Mark Would require controlled testing and double blind studies. Nope. It would require a sonogram for definitive diagnosis, which is the first step. It would then require a flush, which is cheapo, and then a follow-up sonogram to see if the stones are still there. Simple. So simple that one wonders why the proponents of these flushes do not apply to NCCAM for a couple of bucks to provide the studies. The only reason I can think of is that they are afraid the results wil show that the flushes do not work.
Yeah, it’s amusing how alties always use that the old red herring of needing to do a huge study to prove their results. Sometimes it’s true, but most times it’s not. Depending upon the specfic case, you don’t always need to do such large studies to develop preliminary evidence supporting your claim. In the case of gallbladder flushes, I have posted repeatedly an example of a trial that could be done for maybe $20,000 that would demonstrate whether or not the claim that flushes can get rid of gallstones has enough merit to go on to a bigger study for confirmation. Basically, all that would have to be done is to find some patients with ultrasound-confirmed symptomatic gallstone disease scheduled to undergo surgery and then, before surgery, do ultrasounds before, during, and after a course of gallbladder flushes to see if the number of gallstones decreased. Very simple. Not very expensive as far as medical studies go. In addition, patients can look at their stools and retrieve anything that looks like gallstones so that they can be analyzed to determine if they are, in fact, gallstones or not. Very simple. Not very expensive. Yet I have not seen a single altie describe or quote such a study? Why has such a blindingly obvious and simple study not been done? It’s so freaking simple as far as medical studies go, yet it appears that alties haven’t done it. — Orac |"A statement of fact cannot be insolent." | |"If you cannot listen to the answers, why do you | inconvenience me with questions?"
Response:
Again, just curious. How would you do a Million Dollar, double blind, controlled test on what, olive oil & something else? Would you also use a "placebo"? Seems like all this would be a little overkill just to find out what the "stones" are actually composed of. But that’s just me.
Explained in another post by me. The claim that a million dollar study would be needed up front was a red herring. You don’t need to start with a million dollar study to develop preliminary evidence in support of flushes. I described how such a preliminary single arm study could be done for $10,000 or $20,000. If the less expensive study was promising, then the larger study could be undertaken. The less expensive study would involve patients with documented symptomatic gallstone disease scheduled to undergo surgery. They would delay their surgery a few weeks or months in order to undergo "flushes." Ultrasound studies would be done before, during, and after the series of flushes to see if the number of gallstones decreased during therapy. Any objects that look like stones passed in their stools would be examined to determine if they are stones. Their gallbladders could all then be examined after surgery to look for evidence of gallstone dissolution and pathologic changes. Promising results that might support a randomized study would include objective evidence of a decrease in gallstone number on ultrasound or large numbers of gallstones being passed in the stool of the patients. If more money were available, this could be made into a small randomized study in which one group got the flushes before surgery and one group did not. If the pilot study were promising, a bigger study could be done to confirm and extend the results. — Orac |"A statement of fact cannot be insolent." | |"If you cannot listen to the answers, why do you | inconvenience me with questions?"
Response:
It may be overkill but the "Scientific world" requires it and even then they would say, in denial, it isn’t peer reviewed and backed by many other studies. This doesn’t seem to apply to the Pharm Giants though. Their word is taken because they would never profit from bent statements. (sarc)
Wrong. It would not be difficult to do a much less expensive study to see if gallbladder flushes do what alties claim they do. The less expensive study would involve patients with documented symptomatic gallstone disease scheduled to undergo surgery. They would delay their surgery a few weeks or months in order to undergo "flushes." Ultrasound studies would be done before, during, and after the series of flushes to see if the number of gallstones decreased during therapy. Any objects that look like stones passed in their stools would be examined to determine if they are stones. Their gallbladders could all then be examined after surgery to look for evidence of gallstone dissolution and pathologic changes. Promising results that might support a randomized study would include objective evidence of a decrease in gallstone number on ultrasound or large numbers of gallstones being passed in the stool of the patients. If more money were available, this could be made into a small randomized study in which one group got the flushes before surgery and one group did not. If the pilot study were promising, a bigger study could be done to confirm and extend the results. Such a pilot study could be done for maybe $20,000. Are you saying alties can’t come up with that much money for a study? — Orac |"A statement of fact cannot be insolent." | |"If you cannot listen to the answers, why do you | inconvenience me with questions?"
Response:
Would require controlled testing and double blind studies.
Nope. It would require a sonogram for definitive diagnosis, which is the first step. It would then require a flush, which is cheapo, and then a follow-up sonogram to see if the stones are still there. Simple. So simple that one wonders why the proponents of these flushes do not apply to NCCAM for a couple of bucks to provide the studies. The only reason I can think of is that they are afraid the results wil show that the flushes do not work. This may cost up – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – to one million dollars to perform. The medical control people have made sure that "no money" medical procedures are never tested so they can keep putting them down and disputing them successfully to the ignorant people. Curious…has nobody out there done any definitive serious testing in this area to determine whether there is any value in "stone flushing" or whether its devotees are several salami slices short of a sandwich? What about all that Government CAM money research? Doesn’t seem like this would be rocket science…or would it? Or maybe the product sellers//practioners would rather this info not be known? .
Response:
It may be overkill but the "Scientific world" requires it and even then they would say, in denial, it isn’t peer reviewed and backed by many other studies. This doesn’t seem to apply to the Pharm Giants though. Their word is taken because they would never profit from bent statements. (sarc)
– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Again, just curious. How would you do a Million Dollar, double blind, controlled test on what, olive oil & something else? Would you also use a "placebo"? Seems like all this would be a little overkill just to find out what the "stones" are actually composed of. But that’s just me.
Response:
Again, just curious. How would you do a Million Dollar, double blind, controlled test on what, olive oil & something else? Would you also use a "placebo"? Seems like all this would be a little overkill just to find out what the "stones" are actually composed of. But that’s just me.
Response:
(Best thing would be some kind of scan before and after)
That is what I asked Bew for and Bew took a hike on a direct response. That is exactly the problem with Alties such as Bew, when asked a direct question that can lead to proof of their claims, they do not provide a direct answer. – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – I’d like to see someone actually take these stones and mail them off to a lab to see what indeed they are. Anth (You should speak to someone in here who did a flush and found out later that his bladder was still full of stones) He reported pain relief though. Anth Are you thinking of trying a gallbladder flush . There are many out there , the one that worked for me and others I know was the olive oil and grapefruit juice . I had great success with it and got rid of hundreds of stones as did others I know . I do the flush at least twice a year . I have gone from pain , sickness and feeling constantly bloated to feeling great , my gallbladder attacks disappeared after the first flush I did three years ago and have never returned . It certainly gave me a new lease on life , check it if you are wondering and make up your own mind about it . Cheers — Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Response:
Would require controlled testing and double blind studies.
Eventually, but not necessarily right off the bat. This may cost up to one million dollars to perform.
Preliminary studies wouldn’t. (See below.) The medical control people have made sure that "no money" medical procedures are never tested so they can keep putting them down and disputing them successfully to the ignorant people.
What alties seem to forget is that controlled studies are the last step in developing evidence for a treatment. Before that, you have to do preliminary studies to determine if the controlled studies are even worth pursuing. If the preliminary studies are promising, THEN the randomized studies become worthwhile. Often, these preliminary studies are not all that expensive. Certainly, in the case of gallbladder flushes, it would be relatively inexpensive. One preliminary study would actually be fairly easy and straightforward. It wouldn’t even be that expensive and could probably be done for maybe $10,000 or $20,000, depending on the number of patients used. You would need a group of patients with symptomatic gallstones documented by ultrasound and whatever other medical tests were appropriate. You could choose a group that was going to undergo surgery anyway, but have them delay their surgery a few weeks to undergo the full course of gallbladder flushes. You could then do ultrasound studies of them before the flushes, in the middle of the flushes, and after the flushes are complete. Anything they pass in their stool that looks like it might be a stone, you would count and send to the lab to determine if it really is a stone. At the end, you would look at the pathology results of the gallbladders removed and carefully look at the remaining stones to see if there were any signs that they had shrunk. (The cost of surgery would not be in the study budget because surgery is the standard of care for symptomatic gallbladder disease and would therefore be paid for by insurance or other means.) Any objective evidence that the number of gallstones decreased in the group of people treated with flushes would be considered a promising result. Any evidence that people undergoing gallbladder flushes were passing lots of gallstones in their stool would be considered a promising result. Randomized double-blind studies may be the gold standard as far as evidence goes, but less complicated and less expensive studies are the preliminary work necessary to justify them. — Orac |"A statement of fact cannot be insolent." | |"If you cannot listen to the answers, why do you | inconvenience me with questions?"
Response:
Curious…has nobody out there done any definitive serious testing in this area to determine whether there is any value in "stone flushing" or whether its devotees are several salami slices short of a sandwich? What about all that Government CAM money research? Doesn’t seem like this would be rocket science…or would it? Or maybe the product sellers//practioners would rather this info not be known? .
Response:
Would require controlled testing and double blind studies. This may cost up to one million dollars to perform. The medical control people have made sure that "no money" medical procedures are never tested so they can keep putting them down and disputing them successfully to the ignorant people.
– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Curious…has nobody out there done any definitive serious testing in this area to determine whether there is any value in "stone flushing" or whether its devotees are several salami slices short of a sandwich? What about all that Government CAM money research? Doesn’t seem like this would be rocket science…or would it? Or maybe the product sellers//practioners would rather this info not be known? .
Response:
Are you thinking of trying a gallbladder flush . There are many out there , the one that worked for me and others I know was the olive oil and grapefruit juice . I had great success with it and got rid of hundreds of stones No, you got rid of hundreds of little blobs made up of the junk you took to get rid of the gallstones. Gallstones are tiny little things that look like bits of gravel. They aren’t big fatty blobs.
Cholesterol gallstones can be a bit crumbly and deformable, but most gallstones are not. — Orac |"A statement of fact cannot be insolent." | |"If you cannot listen to the answers, why do you | inconvenience me with questions?"
Response:
(Best thing would be some kind of scan before and after) I’d like to see someone actually take these stones and mail them off to a lab to see what indeed they are.
You mean alties haven’t already done this? It would seem to be a VERY obvious thing to do to see if these flushes are working, as would a before-and-after set of ultrasounds or CT scans. Why haven’t such things been done? A positive result for such things would at least be preliminary evidence that these flushes *might* work, but I’ve yet to see an altie show even evidence that rudimentary. — Orac |"A statement of fact cannot be insolent." | |"If you cannot listen to the answers, why do you | inconvenience me with questions?"
Response:
(Best thing would be some kind of scan before and after) I’d like to see someone actually take these stones and mail them off to a lab to see what indeed they are. Anth Exactamundo ! Scanning before and after ! You are on the right track about the "stone" testing.
The next step for him is to start wondering WHY such blindingly obvious studies either have not been done or are never mentioned by proponents of gallbladder flushes. If he reaches that point, there may be hope for him yet. — Orac |"A statement of fact cannot be insolent." | |"If you cannot listen to the answers, why do you | inconvenience me with questions?"
Response:
Curious…has nobody out there done any definitive serious testing in this area to determine whether there is any value in "stone flushing" or whether its devotees are several salami slices short of a sandwich? What about all that Government CAM money research? Doesn’t seem like this would be rocket science…or would it? Or maybe the product sellers//practioners would rather this info not be known?
As I said to Anth, once you start wondering WHY such blindingly obvious studies either haven’t been done or are never mentioned by devotees of gallbladder flushes, you have started on the road to–shudder–scientific questioning of alt-med claims. Just a little further, and you can join us on the Dark Side.
— Orac |"A statement of fact cannot be insolent." | |"If you cannot listen to the answers, why do you | inconvenience me with questions?"
Response:
(Best thing would be some kind of scan before and after) I’d like to see someone actually take these stones and mail them off to a lab to see what indeed they are. Anth
– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – (You should speak to someone in here who did a flush and found out later that his bladder was still full of stones) He reported pain relief though. Anth Are you thinking of trying a gallbladder flush . There are many out there , the one that worked for me and others I know was the olive oil and grapefruit juice . I had great success with it and got rid of hundreds of stones as did others I know . I do the flush at least twice a year . I have gone from pain , sickness and feeling constantly bloated to feeling great , my gallbladder attacks disappeared after the first flush I did three years ago and have never returned . It certainly gave me a new lease on life , check it if you are wondering and make up your own mind about it . Cheers — Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Response:
(Best thing would be some kind of scan before and after) I’d like to see someone actually take these stones and mail them off to a lab to see what indeed they are. Anth
Exactamundo ! Scanning before and after ! You are on the right track about the "stone" testing. — Take out the G’RBAGE to reply
Response:
(You should speak to someone in here who did a flush and found out later that his bladder was still full of stones) He reported pain relief though. Anth
– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Are you thinking of trying a gallbladder flush . There are many out there , the one that worked for me and others I know was the olive oil and grapefruit juice . I had great success with it and got rid of hundreds of stones as did others I know . I do the flush at least twice a year . I have gone from pain , sickness and feeling constantly bloated to feeling great , my gallbladder attacks disappeared after the first flush I did three years ago and have never returned . It certainly gave me a new lease on life , check it if you are wondering and make up your own mind about it . Cheers — Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Response:
Are you thinking of trying a gallbladder flush . There are many out there , the one that worked for me and others I know was the olive oil and grapefruit juice . I had great success with it and got rid of hundreds of stones as did others I know . I do the flush at least twice a year . I have gone from pain , sickness and feeling constantly bloated to feeling great , my gallbladder attacks disappeared after the first flush I did three years ago and have never returned . It certainly gave me a new lease on life , check it if you are wondering and make up your own mind about it . Cheers — Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Response:
Are you thinking of trying a gallbladder flush . There are many out there , the one that worked for me and others I know was the olive oil and grapefruit juice . I had great success with it and got rid of hundreds of stones as did others I know . I do the flush at least twice a year . I have gone from pain , sickness and feeling constantly bloated to feeling great , my gallbladder attacks disappeared after the first flush I did three years ago and have never returned . It certainly gave me a new lease on life , check it if you are wondering and make up your own mind about it .
That may be your problem, you are merely leasing your life. I own mine.
Response:
Are you thinking of trying a gallbladder flush . There are many out there , the one that worked for me and others I know was the olive oil and grapefruit juice . I had great success with it and got rid of hundreds of stones
No, you got rid of hundreds of little blobs made up of the junk you took to get rid of the gallstones. Gallstones are tiny little things that look like bits of gravel. They aren’t big fatty blobs. — David Wright :: alphabeta at prodigy.net These are my opinions only, but they’re almost always correct. "If I have not seen as far as others, it is because giants were standing on my shoulders." (Hal Abelson, MIT)
Categories:
